Thank you, Alan! I appreciate your concise explanation of the absurdities. I will use this in the future for people who can't seem to see the smoke & mirrors. Much appreciated.
Don't you wonder what Thomas and Alito are thinking here? I mean, they ARE jurists and presumably versed in the law and precedent. How do they justify approving whatever "argument" the current administration puts forth, no matter how far fetched? Is it all just my team vs. the world?
Much as I would like to agree with Thomas and Alioto, I would like to see how they counter the arguments made in this post, which appear to be persuasive
Thank you, Alan! I appreciate your concise explanation of the absurdities. I will use this in the future for people who can't seem to see the smoke & mirrors. Much appreciated.
Don't you wonder what Thomas and Alito are thinking here? I mean, they ARE jurists and presumably versed in the law and precedent. How do they justify approving whatever "argument" the current administration puts forth, no matter how far fetched? Is it all just my team vs. the world?
Much as I would like to agree with Thomas and Alioto, I would like to see how they counter the arguments made in this post, which appear to be persuasive