The scale of Israel’s attack on Iran’s military infrastructure is vast, taking in dozens of nuclear-related facilities as well as nuclear scientists, top military commanders, air defenses, and missile sites. Does this put an end to the threat of Iran developing nuclear weapons?
No. It will certainly slow the Iraniana down, but as this is written it appears that a significant part of the nuclear infrastructure may survive. And even if Israel manages in the next few days to make this infrastructure unusable for a time, the Iranian regime – enraged by its humiliation – can and will rebuild.
In perspective, past Israeli attacks on nuclear reactors in Iraq (1981) and Syria (2007) did put an end to the intentions of Saddam Hussein and Bashir al-Assad to produce plutonium for a bomb. But the Iranian program is much more advanced and was from the outset built to withstand attack. So when the Iranians rebuild, everything will be put even further underground. At best, will Israel have to strike every decade or so just to keep the lawn mowed?
The big question – regarding which there is so far no hard news – is the Fordow enrichment facility, buried deep under a mountain. The Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. says there is a plan to destroy Fordow, and maybe this plan will be unveiled in days or hours to come. But in the meantime, the experts say that only the U.S. has a bomb big enough and a plane big enough to carry such a bomb.
And after the dust settles, will Iran remain in the Non-Proliferation Treaty and subject to international inspection, or will it withdraw as it can legally, and as North Korea did? The hard-liners in Teheran will have the upper hand.
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu may call on the Iranians to throw out their government, but in the midst of massive attacks on the country his call for revolt is pathetic.
Before Trump foolishly withdrew from the previous agreement, Iran was boxed in and producing enriched uranium only at the low 3.67% fuel grade. Now it possesses enriched uranium at the 60% level, days away from weapon-grade.
And if Trump believes that the Israeli attack will lead to a deal better than what Obama obtained, then his understanding of the Middle East is even more infantile than previously imagined.
This may get worse, far worse, before (if ever) it gets better.
Your position is that Trump is foolish because of his withdrawal from a treaty that kept enrichment at 3.67% fuel grade. You fail to point out that Iran was violating the JCPOA agreement even prior to US withdrawal by building secret facilities than enriched beyond this level. Additionally, the treaty rewarded Iran with tens of billions of dollars of 'relief; vthat was used. to fund, train and arm proxy terrorist groups throughout the Middle East (Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis and many more...). These groups directly threatened America and her allies and are directly linked to all the conflicts past and present in the Middle East.
One key piece of information hat this writer just somehow forgot to include is that the JCPOA sunset after 10-15 years, depending on the clause, in which Iran could legally enrich and centrifuge away with international backing..after taking the cash.
That 2015 deal was lousy and the author must know that
Trump and others may or may not get a deal or a better deal, or worse deal, but 2015 JCPOA did NOT box Iran in or stop them or contain them..Just delayed them while they took in cash, sold oil, etc